MRSA Information



What is MRSA?

MRSA is a type of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Staphylococcus aureus, often referred to simply as "staph," are bacteria commonly carried on the skin or in the nose of healthy people. Some S. aureus are resistant to the class of antibiotics that are frequently used to treat staph such as methicillin-and thus are called methicillin-resistant S. aureus(MRSA).

Who gets MRSA?

S. aureus (staph) including MRSA can be spread among people having close contact with infected people. MRSA is almost always spread by direct physical contact and not through the air. Spread may also occur through indirect contact by touching objects (e.g., towels, sheets, wound dressings, clothes, workout areas, or sports equipment) contaminated by the infected skin of a person with staph bacteria or MRSA.

Just as S. aureus can be carried on the skin or in the nose without causing any disease, MRSA can be carried in this way also. This is known as colonization.
MRSA infections are usually mild, superficial infections of the skin that can be treated successfully with proper skin care and antibiotics. MRSA, however, can be difficult to treat and can progress to life-threatening blood or bone infections because there are fewer effective antibiotics available for treatment.

MRSA infections occur commonly among persons in hospitals and healthcare facilities. However, MRSA can cause illness in persons outside of hospitals and healthcare facilities as well. Cases of MRSA infection in the community have been associated with recent antibiotic use, sharing contaminated items, having recurrent skin diseases, and living in crowded settings. Clusters of skin infections caused by MRSA have been described among injecting drug-users (1,2); aboriginals in Canada (3), New Zealand (4) and Australia (5,6); Native Americans in the United States (7); incarcerated persons (8); players of close-contact sports (9,10); men who have sex with men (MSM); and other populations (11-17). Most of the transmission in these settings appeared to be from people with active MRSA skin infections.

How do I know if I got MRSA from the community or from a healthcare setting?

Persons with MRSA infections that meet all of the following criteria likely have community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections:Diagnosis of MRSA was made in the outpatient setting or by a culture positive for MRSA within 48 hours after admission to the hospital. The patient has no medical history of MRSA infection or colonization The patient has no medical history in the past year of: Hospitalization Admission to a nursing home, skilled nursing facility, or hospice Dialysis Surgery The patient has no permanent indwelling catheters or medical devices that pass through the skin into the body.



If my doctor or healthcare provider has told me that I have an MRSA skin infection, what can I do to prevent others from getting infected?

You can prevent spreading an MRSA infection to those you live with or others around you by following these steps:Keep infections, particularly those that continue to produce pus or to drain material, covered with clean, dry bandages. Follow your healthcare provider's instructions on proper care of the wound. Pus from infected wounds can contain MRSA and spread the bacteria to others. Advise your family and other close contacts to wash their hands frequently with soap and warm water, especially if they change your bandages or touch the infected wound or potentially infectious materials. Avoid sharing personal items (e.g., towels, washcloth, razor, clothing, or uniforms) that may have had contact with the infected wound and potentially infectious material. Wash linens and clothes that become soiled with hot water and laundry detergent. Drying clothes in a hot dryer, rather than air-drying, also helps kill bacteria in clothes. Tell any healthcare providers who treat you that you have an antibiotic-resistant staph skin infection.

How is MRSA diagnosed?

A sample of the infected wound (either a small biopsy of skin or pus taken with a swab) must be obtained to grow the bacteria in the microbiology laboratory. Once the staph is growing, the organism is tested to determine which antibiotics will be effective for treating the infection. A culture of skin lesions is especially useful in recurrent or persistent cases of skin infection, in cases of antibiotic failure, and in cases that present with advanced or aggressive infections.



What is the mortality rate of CA-MRSA?

CA-MRSA infections are typically limited to the skin and do not result in severe disease (such as infection of the bloodstream) or death. However, on rare occasion, CA-MRSA can cause severe illness even when treated quickly, as in the cases of four children who died from CA-MRSA (18).

Does CDC think CA-MRSA should be reportable?

The decision to make a particular disease reportable to public health authorities is made by each state based on the needs of that individual state. CDC supports the resolutions passed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) in May 2003. For more information on CSTE resolutions regarding MRSA go to: http://www.cste.org/

I have heard this bacterium is attacking healthy people and healthy skin. Is this what CDC is seeing?

Yes, staph infections commonly affect healthy people and healthy skin. Usually, these infections are easily treated. Any activity that promotes breakdown in skin integrity (e.g., chronic skin infections, physical trauma, poor health) can promote staph skin infections including those caused by MRSA.



Are people who are positive for the human immune deficiency virus (HIV) at increased risk for MRSA? Should they be taking special precautions?

People with increased exposure to antibiotics and the healthcare setting may be at increased risk for antibiotic-resistant infections of various kinds, including MRSA. People with compromised immune systems, which include some patients with HIV, may be at risk for more severe illness if they get infected with MRSA.

Why does CDC think so many cases of MRSA are being recognized across the country?

MRSA has been recognized as a problem in the healthcare setting for over 20 years. CDC believes that MRSA has been emerging in the community over the last several years. It is difficult to determine whether there is an increase in MRSA disease in the community or an increased awareness and recognition of MRSA disease. However, it is clear that some of the recently recognized outbreaks of CA-MRSA are associated with strains that have some unique properties compared to the traditional hospital-based MRSA strains, suggesting some biologic properties (like virulence factors) may allow the CA-MRSA strains to spread more or cause more disease; however, these hypothesis need testing and confirmation.



Are all the cases of CA-MRSA in the U.S caused by the same strain of staph? Are these cases all related?

At present, there appears to be at least three different strains of staphylococci that can cause CA-MRSA infections in the
United States. CDC continues to work with state health departments to gather both the organisms and epidemiologic data from all the cases reported in the medical media to determine why certain groups of people get infections with these organisms. Efforts to evaluate staphylococci from around the U.S. are ongoing.

What is CDC doing about CA-MRSA?

Public Health Response

  • CDC is providing technical assistance to various professional organizations and state health departments to develop guidance for control of MRSA.
  • CDC is beginning a national program of surveillance for serious infections with MRSA.



Prevention Activities

Outbreaks among correctional facilities

Outbreaks among athletic Teams

  • CDC plans to review existing disease prevention guidelines developed by sporting organizations (e.g. The National Collegiate Athletic Association).
  • LINK TO MMWR for more information:
    www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5233a4.htm

Outbreaks among men who have sex with men (MSM)

  • CDC has worked with gay and lesbian health clinics throughout the country to develop infection control measures to prevent the spread of MRSA, to encourage culturing of skin lesions to determine if a patient has MRSA, and to develop a fact sheet for patients who are concerned about MRSA.
  • CDC continues to provide technical microbiologic and epidemiologic support to Los Angeles County and other health departments conducting investigations of CA-MRSA infections.
  • LINK TO MMWR for more information:
    www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5205a4.htm

Surveillance and epidemiologic studies in community populations

  • In 2000, CDC began working closely with four states, with a combined population of about 12 million persons, to study the epidemiology of CA-MRSA infections. The information from these studies is helping CDC understand the nature of the disease, why people get infected, and to develop future studies designed to improve our ability to prevent these infections. These data are being collected in Connecticut, Minnesota, Georgia, and Maryland as part of CDC's Emerging Infections Program, Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs). This program is being expanded to six states in 2004.
  • In addition to enhancing our detection of MRSA cases in healthcare settings by adding a module to CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network, we are working with representatives of state health departments to augment a national surveillance program for invasive MRSA, including CA-MRSA infections.CDC is using data collected in outbreak investigations in correctional facilities, in athletic teams, in children, in MSM and from sporadic cases to learn about strain characteristics, risk factors for disease, and prevention measures and to provide clinical education about CA-MRSA. Some of this information has been published in the MMWR. Findings from investigations in various settings will be published in peer-reviewed literature and the MMWR over the next year.
  • Representatives from 40 states and territories participated in a March 2003 meeting on enhancing state-based reporting of MRSA. CDC is working with states that are interested in initiating or expanding surveillance of MRSA (both CA- and healthcare-associated MRSA) in their states.


References:
1. Saravolatz LD, Markowitz N, Arking L, Pohloh D, Fisher E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Epidemiologic oberservations during a community-acquired outbreak. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:11-16.
2. Centers for Disease Contorl and Prevention. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections-Michigan. MMWR. 1981;30:185-7.
3. Embil J, Ramotar K, Romance L, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in tertiary care institutions on the Canadian prairies 1990-1992. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:646-51.
4. Rings T, Findlay R, Lang S. Ethnicity and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in
South Auckland. N Zeal Medica Journal 1998; 111:151.
5. Maguire GP, Arthur AD, Boustead PJ, Dwyer B, Currie BJ. Emerging epidemic of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the
Northern Territory. Medical Journal of Australia 1996; 1996; 164:721-3.
6. Collignon P, Gosbell I, Vickery A, Nimmo G, Stylianopoulos T, Gottlieb T. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australia. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Lancet 1998; 352:145-6.
7. Groos A, Naimi T, Wolset D, Smith-Johnson K, Moore K, Cheek J. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a rural American Indian community (Abstract 1230), 39th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin or soft tissue infections in a state prison-Mississippi, 2000. MMWR 2001; 50 (42): 919-22.
9. Lindenmayer JM, Schoenfeld S, O'Grady R, Carney JK. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school wrestling team and the surrounding community. Arch Int Med 1998;158:895-9.
10. Stacey AR, Endersby KE, Chan PC, Marples RR. An outbreak of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a rugby football team. Br J Sports Med 1998; 332: 153-4.
11. Kallen AJ, Driscoll TJ, Thornton S, Olson PE, Wallace MR. Increase in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a Naval Medical Center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:223-6.
12. Hussain FM, Boyle-Vavra S,
Bethel CD, Daum RS. Current trends in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a tertiary care pediatric facility. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000; 19: 1163-6.
13. Feder HM, Jr. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in 2 pediatric outpatients. Arch Fam Med 2000; 1163-6.
14. Goetz A, Posey K, Fleming J, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community: a hospital-based study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999 20:689-91.
15. Frank
AL, Marcinak JK, Mangat PD, Schreckenberger PC. Community-acquired and clindamycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:993-1000.
16. Price MF, McBride ME, Wolf JE, Jr., Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a dermatology outpatient population. South Med J 1998:91:369-71.
17. Herold BC, Immergluck LC, Maranan MC, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. JAMA 1998;279:593-8.
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus -
Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997-1999. JAMA 1999;282:1123-5.